| Taxonomy originated and has long traditions in Europe. European scientists have studied the diversity of plants, animals, fungi, and microorganisms on land and in sea. Despite the long history of taxonomy there are still large groups of organisms that are untouched and in the same time specialists are lacking, e.g. arthropod and non-arthropod invertebrate groups, inconspicuous homo- and heterobasidiomycetes; nonpathogenic or weakly pathogenic plant surface, endophytic, litter-decaying and aquatic or marine ascomycetes, nonsporulating or very slowly growing hyphomycetes; hyphomycetous and ascomycetous cryptic species, etc. Some taxonomically complicated groups of vascular plants and animal groups with cryptic variation marine microplankton and microbenthos need further consideration. Unicellular microorganisms are another understudied field, although some special efforts are being directed towards taxonomy of micro-organism (e.g., the Belgian Coordinated Collection of Micro-organisms BCCM).
New and innovative developments in taxonomy have taken place mainly in respect to molecular methods and databasing and new approaches towards elucidating and understanding the phylogenetic relationships. However classical taxonomic approach is the required background for molecular taxonomy, otherwise the results of the latter become and ambiguous unreliable.
Most European taxonomic research and infrastructure is currently financed nationally, but funds are in short supply, and almost everywhere fewer and fewer staff are burdened with more and more administrative work to the detriment of basic taxonomic research. Although on the European level there are number of running initiatives that facilitate access to the largest herbaria and data sources, e.g. may be add some of them there are number of taxonomic institutions, particularly in the ACC countries, that are in crisis both in terms of funds and staff.
Why to support taxonomy?
1. Taxonomy and systematics are the backbone for biodiversity research, conservation and sustainable use as they define and provide the overview of the units of biodiversity - the species.
Taxonomy provides the basic elements for research and conservation of biodiversity. The results of taxonomic research are likely to improve the public good, and to improve policy and decision making. It will also promise potential benefits to the environment, to society and in some cases, to the economy.
Taxonomy offers researchers in any field of biological science the tools to communicate about organisms. These tools consist of standardised rules and procedures that ensure internal consistency in scientific naming of organisms, and can be applied with confidence to any group of organisms wherever it is found on earth (International Codes of Bacteriological, Botanical, Zoological Nomenclature, nomenclatural codes for viruses, cultivated plants,).
Taxonomy requires a long-term commitment by researchers and decision makers. When compared to other disciplines, a relatively long and intense training is needed to become a knowledgeable expert in the taxonomy of any group. Similarly, the establishment of a useful and valuable taxonomic infrastructure is mostly a process, which takes many years. Therefore the discontinuation of taxonomic traditions, as witnessed today, results in hard to revert losses of knowledge.
Taxonomy is unlikely to be financed by private foundations or commercial companies. For all these reasons, taxonomic research needs public funding.
2. Taxonomy is a research field, which is at the cross-roads between science and society. There are strong traditions in some countries (UK, Germany, the Netherlands) for amateurs in taxonomy of certain popular organism groups, e.g. orchids, butterflies, etc. However strong support by professional taxonomists is needed to underpin the scientific value of their work. There is a clear link between the traditions in taxonomy in a specific country and the level of public awareness and support for protection and sustainable use of biodiversity at local and regional scale.
3. Taxonomy in the ACC countries needs specific support because:
The economy of many ACC countries is still in transition. Most of the taxonomic research and major biological collections are concentrated in the universities and academy of sciences that are mainly state institutions with very low budget. Therefore the salaries for researchers, even compared to local standards are very low; the equipment is rather old and there is a lack of incentives for young scientists to choose the academic career and enter the field of taxonomy.
Underdeveloped research infrastructure for taxonomy and systematics in the ACC countries can be an obstacle for these countries to adequately participate in the future ERA.
The importance of taxonomy for the investigation, protection, and sustainable use of biodiversity has been recognized on the international, and European level:
1. Governments, through the Convention on Biological Diversity, have acknowledged the existence of a "taxonomic impediment" to the sound management of biodiversity and a Global Taxonomic Initiative (GTI) has been established to deal with the knowledge gaps in the taxonomic system (including those associated with genetic systems), the shortage of trained taxonomists and curators, and the impact these deficiencies have on our ability to conserve, use and share the benefits of our biological diversity.
2. EU Biodiversity Strategy: Theme 3: apply modern taxonomy to build scientific tools for policy on conservation and sustainable use, aiming inter alia, to fulfil gaps in taxonomy knowledge
3. European Commission: Concern for the importance of taxonomic research and its support has been expressed in the Communication from the Commission: The European Research Area: providing new momentum; Action Plan for Biodiversity Research in Europe, etc. Special attention has been given to:
inventory: knowledge on taxonomy and systematics of many groups must be improved with the primary goal to identify and list the European species that are under threat of global extinction
genetic variation: work on the genetics of populations and species for conservation and to understand ecosystem structure, function and resilience
the CBD ecosystem approach requires substantial research to make it effective as a policy and management tool and to clarify how biological diversity affects the ecosystem approach and vice versa.
classification of habitats and ecosystems: research is needed to extend, refine and exploit the existing classifications, preferably based on taxonomically sound clusters of species composition and distribution in the habitats and to adapt them better to the practical needs of users
soils: research is needed to understand how soil biodiversity responds to stress, the role of soil biodiversity in ecosystem function, resilience and recovery
What should be done:
1. Biodiversity research projects should, wherever possible and reasonable, include work packages on taxonomy and systematics, as part of the Community contribution to the Global Taxonomy Initiative. Work to develop taxonomy or systematics should be carried out in conjunction with projects that touch on other biodiversity issues
2. Special efforts are needed to support research on the inventory and taxonomy of poorly known groups of organisms (incl. micro-organisms) in Europe and to understand their often crucial role in ecosystem functioning. Classical taxonomic approaches (morphological studies, embryology, karyology, chemotaxonomy) must be combined with modern molecular ones in the study of taxonomically complicated groups.
3. Networking of taxonomic data (e.g. Euro+Med Plant Base, Fauna Europaea, Species 2000) should be fostered and clear terms of access and use of the results of these projects should be formulated.
4. Open up existing actions (e.g., Marie Curie Action) to proposals dealing with taxonomic issues. The access to the biological collections should be provided and improved. Their maintenance, enrichment and even rehabilitation should also be supported with special reference to the ACC countries.
|